RLStalk: End of the Road for Internet Explorer? - RLStalk

Jump to content

extremeseed.com | Extreme Seed

Welcome to RLStalk

Welcome to RLStalk - The Official Forum of RLSlog.net, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information.
Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message © 2010 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

End of the Road for Internet Explorer? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Digi Icon

  • Cupcake
  • Icon
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 07-December 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 March 2009 - 09:02 PM

[quote=PcWorld]IE 8: End of the Road for Internet Explorer?

Randall C. Kennedy, Infoworld

IE8 is the last version of the Internet Explorer Web browser. At least, that's what I'm hearing through the grapevine. It seems that Microsoft is preparing to throw in the towel on its Internet Explorer engine once and for all.

And just what will be its replacement? I'm getting conflicting stories on that one. Some are still claiming that Microsoft will go with WebKit, which, thanks to the popularity of Apple's Safari browser and also Google's Chrome, is rapidly becoming a de facto standard for all non-IE and non-Firefox implementations.

Others insist that that the whole WebKit story is merely a feint and that Microsoft will in fact be adopting a brand-new engine coming out of its Microsoft Research division. Dubbed "Gazelle," this new engine will supposedly be more secure than Firefox or even Chrome, making copious use of sandboxing to keep its myriad plug-ins isolated and the overall browser process model protected.

But regardless of which direction Microsoft takes -- WebKit or Gazelle -- it will still have to navigate the treacherous waters of legacy ActiveX support. And as someone who has spent some not-so-quality time developing ActiveX controls in the past, the need to maintain some sort of compatibility layer within any proposed IE replacement is a critical consideration.

For most casual users (i.e., grandma in her den surfing eBay), ActiveX was and is just another annoying RIA (rich Internet application) mechanism, one that has increasingly been supplanted by Adobe Flash or various AJAX-based mechanisms. However, for enterprise IT shops with a heavy Microsoft investment, ActiveX has long been an integral part of many in-house applications.

If Microsoft intends to pull the plug on IE after version 8, it will need to articulate a clear legacy migration strategy that allows these shops to preserve their investments in ActiveX controls and resources.

Then there's the issue of legacy HTML/CSS support. So much of the Web has been tweaked for IE 6.x compatibility that even Microsoft's own attempts to implement a more standards-compliant browser engine in IE8 have met with disastrous results. For me, the situation so bad that when I do find myself using IE 8 (typically, to view a site that causes my copy of the Chrome 2.x beta release to blow up), I end up configuring IE 8's compatibility mode as the default viewing option since the browser's native rendering mode breaks practically every site I visit.

Finally, there's the matter of third-party developers using IE's rendering engine with their own applications. A good example would be a program that includes a help file in HTML format and then uses a custom form to display an embedded Web browser object to host the file. This embedded object is invariably an ActiveX container for the IE engine that's installed with Windows, so any attempt to remove IE from the OS -- or to radically change its core underpinnings -- will need to account for applications that rely on the existence of an accessible, programmable IE object model.

Of course, all of the above is old hat for Microsoft, a company whose status as global software leader too often makes it a victim of its own success. I, for one, look forward to the possibility of a clean break with IE's creaky old rendering engine. But I hope the company pays more care and attention to preserving legacy compatibility than it did with some of its more recent OS efforts.[/quote]

Hope so!
0

#2 User is offline   GoreTastic Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 118
  • Joined: 20-December 08

Posted 21 March 2009 - 04:40 PM

God I hope so, that is a worthless piece of software.
0

#3 User is offline   boomdog Icon

  • Pro Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Users
  • Posts: 1,328
  • Joined: 13-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Down Under
  • Interests:Media, Gaming and Design

Posted 25 April 2009 - 01:37 PM

Stupid IE ruined my XP computer like 2 years ago :angry:

Both Chrome and Firefox run much better
0

#4 User is offline   SceneIt Icon

  • Newbie
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 27-April 09

Posted 27 April 2009 - 05:06 AM

Since firefox came out, I never went back to IE. The slew of plugins available and the wide community has definitely improved my surfing experience.

I feel extremely handicapped whenever I have to use IE on a mates computer. Eventually I just preach to them to use firefox :P

Unless Microsoft ever considers to do something like Firefox does (plugins etc.), they're going down the drain :/
0

#5 User is offline   supjay Icon

  • Extreme Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Users
  • Posts: 419
  • Joined: 26-December 08

Posted 27 April 2009 - 11:04 AM

I don't think they would drop IE like that. I personally don't use it, still it has the majority of the browser market. Switching to a brand new engine will not happen after IE is stopped. If they are going with a new engine, they would offer both browsers in parallel for sometime, if not MS would lose the browser market.
Posted Image]
0

#6 User is offline   Alb Icon

  • Extreme Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Users
  • Posts: 480
  • Joined: 13-December 08
  • Location:UK, England
  • Interests:Art, Animation, Design, Photography, Movies, Computers, Swimming...

Posted 30 April 2009 - 10:45 AM

I hope they adopt Firefox but then again I don't want Microsoft to buy the browser.

As for IE I'd say I use it about 30, maybe 40 times a year unlike Firefox which I use everyday. Yesterday I updated IE through WU just to see if it's any different (it was a bit) but I can't use it for long because I'm so used to how Firefox looks and works.
0

#7 User is offline   boomdog Icon

  • Pro Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Users
  • Posts: 1,328
  • Joined: 13-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Down Under
  • Interests:Media, Gaming and Design

Posted 08 May 2009 - 07:08 AM

I randomly opened IE the other day (Firefox/Chrome User now) and it opened instantly, which on Vista is a surprise and then it crashed
0

#8 User is offline   clocktower Icon

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 45
  • Joined: 24-January 09
  • Location:UK

Posted 09 May 2009 - 09:14 AM

you would think by now microshite would employ a browser boffin or knick one from firefox get him onboard and make a bloody descent browser ffs :online2long:
Posted Image

Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users