RLStalk: Swapping files is fair use - RLStalk

Jump to content


extremeseed.com | Extreme Seed

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Swapping files is fair use Top lawyer claims Rate Topic: -----

Posted 20 May 2009 - 11:43 AM (#1) User is offline   Savage 

  • Leecher
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-May 09

Quote

In a move that will set a chill in the music and film industry's bones one of the US's top lawyers is set to take them to the cleaners claiming that file sharing on P2P networks is fair use.

For years the music and film industry avoided taking on Harvard students for file sharing, fearing that there were people there who could give them a run for their money because they would know the law. Now a top law professor Charles Nesson has revealed he will be defending a student against the RIAA by claiming that there is noting illegal about swapping files provided you don't make any money on the transaction.

Nesson is defending file-swapper Joel Tenenbaum and in court filings, revealed a doomsday strategy for the film and music business. If he wins, he will essentially legalize the sharing of all digital goods, copyrighted or not, by noncommercial users. He will argue that statutory damages only apply to commercial infringers. The law offers rightsholders the chance to seek either statutory or actual damages, but that the two are meant to be equivalent.

If the two remedies are equivalent, and if "individual noncommercial copying results in no provable actual harm to the copyright harm holder," then actual damages would be zero-and so would statutory damages.

Fair use is defined by four factors and Nesson is confident he can give a jury evidence relating to each one. Another one of his defences is that the jury should consider "the copyright holder's knowledge of and assumption of risk when it published the copyrighted work that work would be ripped and shared on P2P networks."


Source: Fudzilla
1

Posted 20 May 2009 - 12:59 PM (#2) User is offline   gOnz.af.sUmpan 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 190
  • Joined: 19-January 09
  • Location:sweden

Sound fair enough. But they wont allow it.

"statutory damages only apply to commercial infringers" This would be a good verdict.
Posted Image
0

Posted 20 May 2009 - 02:50 PM (#3) User is offline   Jason 

  • Pro Member
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 309
  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, (Ontario) Canada

I think there may be a hidden motive here. Perhaps he's using scare tactics so the music cartel writes him a cheque with lots of zeros. I guess we'll see...
"With great regret, we can't attend. We stand alone, we stand betrayed." - TNEM
0

Posted 21 May 2009 - 10:24 AM (#4) User is offline   boomdog 

  • Pro Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Users
  • Posts: 1,328
  • Joined: 13-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Down Under
  • Interests:Media, Gaming and Design

Rather than Charles Nesson, lets get Liam Neeson to take them to the cleaners

But honestly, if its like a certain other court case the judge will be stitched up to the RIAA and others
0

Posted 23 May 2009 - 01:18 PM (#5) User is offline   Savage 

  • Leecher
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-May 09

View Postboomdog, on 21 May 2009 - 10:24 AM, said:

But honestly, if its like a certain other court case the judge will be stitched up to the RIAA and others


Than that judge can be removed and any pro-MAFIAA rulings can be dismissed. But that's up to us... if we stand idle by, they could have their way. I want to avoid that!
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter   Or sign in with these services